Selling an Electrical Utilities Business

Utility deals move when you can prove three things quickly: how you earn returns under your rate order or contract terms, how reliable the system is, and what the next decade of capital work will cost. Buyers underwrite safety performance, outage metrics, asset condition, and obligations that survive closing. EBITDA matters, but they will sanity-check it against filings, reliability reports, and the capital plan.

Get a Free ValuationSchedule a CallRead the Guide

What buyers ask and how to be ready

Each topic below comes from real buyer-seller conversations. Here's what they ask, what they're really evaluating, and how to prepare.

Financial Proof

Can you show clean financials and reconcile EBITDA to what really happened in the field (storm costs, riders/trackers, and true pass-throughs)?

Buyers are validating that earnings are repeatable and bankable for an electrical utility, including how riders/trackers, storm deferrals, and power supply pass-throughs flow through the P&L. They will test whether the numbers tie back to rate orders, fuel/power adjustment clauses, and operating reports. When those links are missing, they price in hidden downside and push for a retrade or tighter terms.

How to prepare

  • Tie revenue and expense lines to riders/trackers and pass-through clauses. Document how you normalized major events.
  • Build an add-backs schedule with invoices, policies, and approvals for each item.
  • Create a monthly bridge from reliability metrics and capex activity to financial results.
  • Assemble lender-ready schedules: AR/AP aging, working-capital trends, and capex versus depreciation.

Great Answer

We have 36 months of monthly financials and a bridge that separates fuel/power pass-through from margin items and normalizes major events. Each add-back is supported by invoices and policy documentation, including storm overtime and one-time regulatory/legal spend. The P&L ties to our rider and tracker mechanisms, so you can see what is recurring versus timing.

Okay

We can share the financials and explain the main drivers, but our storm normalization and pass-through mapping are not fully documented yet.

Gives Pause

The books are fine. Storm years are just different. We will explain it in the meeting, and we do not separate pass-through from margin consistently.

How Rejigg helps: Rejigg organizes financials, add-backs, and utility support files in a buyer-ready data room so diligence does not turn into weeks of requests. Learn more in the guide

Regulatory Engine

How do you earn returns, and who sets the rules? What was the last rate case outcome, and what is still open (audits, disallowances, prudence reviews)?

They are underwriting whether costs and capital will be recovered, and how long recovery takes in your jurisdiction. Rate case outcomes show the commission’s posture on ROE, O&M (Operations and Maintenance), and capital additions, plus the risk of disallowances or prudence challenges. Open dockets and audits create timing risk that can change cash flow and closing conditions.

How to prepare

  • Summarize the last rate order: allowed ROE, revenue requirement, key adjustments, and implementation timing.
  • List open dockets, audits, and investigations with dates, current status, and next milestones.
  • Explain each rider/tracker, what it covers, and what portion of revenue depends on it.
  • Write a plain-English earnings narrative and cite the exact filings and orders that support it.

Great Answer

In our last rate order (date), the commission approved an ROE of X% and a revenue requirement of $Y, with adjustments focused on A and B. Those points were addressed in follow-up compliance filings that were accepted on (date). We have one open docket on (topic) with a published procedural schedule, and counsel’s current view is (range of likely outcomes). Trackers cover (items) and represent about Z% of revenue, with consistent approvals over the last N filings.

Okay

We can provide the last order and talk through it, but we have not packaged a clear summary of what drives earnings and what is still open.

Gives Pause

Regulation is politics and unpredictable. The buyer can deal with filings after closing.

How Rejigg helps: Rejigg lets you share rate orders, testimony, and docket timelines to NDA-signed buyers while keeping sensitive stakeholder material controlled. Learn more in the guide

Reliability Story

What does reliability look like in your territory? What is the outage history, what is driving it (storms, equipment, vegetation), and what changed over the last few years?

Reliability trends drive near-term capex, O&M strain, and commission attention. Buyers want to separate major-event volatility from underlying feeder and program issues, such as vegetation cycle slippage or aging underground. They also price the investment needed to stabilize SAIDI/SAIFI and reduce repeat outages.

How to prepare

  • Create a multi-year outage view with a major-event log and any changes to counting rules.
  • Break outages into drivers: vegetation, equipment, underground, substation, protection, and human error.
  • Identify top feeders and top causes, then show the corrective work scheduled for the next 24 months.
  • Document restoration performance, mutual aid agreements, and post-event review practices.

Great Answer

We track SAIDI and SAIFI for the past five years and annotate every major event so spikes are easy to explain. The biggest controllable drivers are vegetation on circuits A/B and underground failures in area C, and our 24-month plan targets those circuits with scoped work, dates, and expected impact. We also have storm playbooks, staging plans, and post-event reviews that show how we restore and what we change afterward.

Okay

We can share outage reports and talk through storms, but we have not fully quantified the drivers or tied fixes to a specific 24-month program.

Gives Pause

Outages are weather. We do not consistently track causes or link them to corrective work.

How Rejigg helps: Rejigg helps you package reliability metrics, major-event context, and the linked capex and vegetation evidence buyers ask for. Learn more in the guide

Asset Condition

What is the real condition of the system, beyond book value? Where are the worst-performing feeders, substations, or transformer risks?

They are looking for deferred inspection and replacement that makes cash flow look better than it is. They also focus on high-consequence failure points, including major transformers, breakers, and critical feeders that can create a large outage or safety event. A candid condition view reduces retrades because it turns surprises into scoped work tied to recovery and reliability impact.

How to prepare

  • Summarize inspection cycles, defect rates, triage rules, and completion performance.
  • Provide a risk-ranked list of assets: poles, underground segments, breakers, and major transformers, with mitigations.
  • Share condition proof: oil tests, infrared results, pole loading studies, and failure trends, plus actions taken.
  • Link the top risks to the capital plan and the reliability benefit expected.

Great Answer

We can show condition by asset class and a ranked risk register with the highest-risk feeders, substations, and transformers called out. Inspection findings go through a defined triage process with target timeframes, and we track completion monthly. The next 24 months of corrective work are scoped with unit costs and outage-window assumptions.

Okay

We have an asset list and inspection records, but they are not yet consolidated into a clear, risk-ranked view.

Gives Pause

Nothing major has failed recently, so the system is fine. Book value should be enough.

How Rejigg helps: Rejigg keeps inspection summaries, condition evidence, and risk-ranked asset lists organized so you are not sending grid details over email. Learn more in the guide

Capex Reality

The capex backlog is the business plan. What has to be built, when it has to be built, and what happens if it slips?

For electrical utilities, the buyer is underwriting whether the plan can be executed with real constraints, including outage windows, permitting, crew availability, and equipment lead times. They also test recovery assumptions, since approved recovery differs from planned recovery. When the plan reads like a wish list, valuation drops, and terms shift toward holdbacks, escrow, or contingent payments.

How to prepare

  • Present a 5 to 10-year plan split into must-do and discretionary projects with clear drivers.
  • Show recovery status for each project: approved, in the next filing, or dependent on policy or funding.
  • List execution constraints: materials lead times, relay and switching resources, permitting, and mitigations.
  • Report delivery history: on-time and on-budget performance, plus unit cost improvements from lessons learned.

Great Answer

Our plan separates mandatory replacement and compliance work from discretionary modernization, and each project has a driver, unit cost basis, and scope. We can show which items are already approved for recovery versus planned for the next filing, including timing sensitivities. We also track delivery performance and the constraints we plan around, including switchgear lead times, outage windows, and crew capacity.

Okay

We have a multi-year capex forecast, but we have not split must-do versus discretionary or pressure-tested it against execution constraints.

Gives Pause

The plan changes every year based on funding. We will set priorities after closing.

How Rejigg helps: Rejigg lets you attach approvals, scopes, and unit-cost support to the capex plan so buyers diligence an executable program. Learn more in the guide

Safety Culture

What is your safety record and safety culture in practice? Who can stop work, how do you enforce switching and LOTO, and what changed after incidents?

Safety drives litigation exposure, regulator action, insurance cost, and workforce retention. Buyers listen for field-level enforcement, supervisor ownership, and contractor controls, since paper programs do not prevent incidents. They also look for repeat patterns and whether corrective actions were verified over time.

How to prepare

  • Compile recordables and serious incidents with root-cause findings and verified corrective actions.
  • Document switching authority, energized-work qualifications, LOTO practices, and stop-work rights.
  • Summarize contractor safety: prequal, audits, and removal process when vendors fail requirements.
  • Provide near-miss and lessons-learned examples that show changes made in the field.

Great Answer

We can show our incident history, root-cause analysis, and the operational changes we made, including procedure updates, supervisor coaching, and training, plus verification that the changes stuck. Switching and LOTO are enforced through clear qualification rules and stop-work authority in the field. Contractor safety is audited, and we have documentation of vendors removed when they failed standards.

Okay

We track incidents and hold safety meetings, but our documentation on enforcement and contractor oversight is still being tightened.

Gives Pause

Incidents happen in this line of work. The safety program is in a binder if you want it.

How Rejigg helps: Rejigg lets you share safety metrics, investigations, and corrective-action proof securely with vetted buyers. Learn more in the guide

Climate & Events

How exposed are you to wildfire, storms, and climate-driven operating changes, and what happens operationally and financially when a major event hits?

They price long-term hardening costs and the downside from a single severe season, which varies by geography and vegetation conditions. They also test whether your documentation would stand up in a wildfire or storm review, and whether mutual aid and materials planning are realistic. Insurance can help, but buyers will read deductibles, exclusions, and claims history closely.

How to prepare

  • Map territory exposure and hardening priorities. Track completion by circuit, miles, and asset class.
  • Provide storm playbooks: mutual aid, staging, materials readiness, and post-event review templates.
  • Summarize insurance terms, deductibles, exclusions, and claims history with remediation actions taken.
  • Show defensibility proof: vegetation and inspection records, QA audits, photos, and work orders.

Great Answer

We can show event history, total cost, and what we changed afterward, and we have a standing storm plan with mutual aid, staging sites, and materials readiness. Hardening progress is tracked by circuit, and we can prove vegetation and inspection work with QA records and work-order history. Insurance is summarized with deductibles, exclusions, and claims history so diligence does not uncover surprises.

Okay

We handle storms well and have insurance, but our hardening tracking and defensibility proof are not packaged cleanly yet.

Gives Pause

We have not had a big event recently, so exposure is probably fine. Insurance should cover it.

How Rejigg helps: Rejigg helps you organize major-event history, claims documents, and defensibility records into a single evidence pack buyers can review. Learn more in the guide

OT Cyber

How do you run protection and control operations, including cybersecurity? Who has access, how are changes approved, and how do you keep one mistake from becoming a system event?

They treat OT as a safety and reliability issue that can cause outages, equipment damage, and restoration delays. Buyers look for disciplined access control, network segmentation, vendor remote access rules, and tested response procedures. The level of formality depends on your size and NERC applicability, but buyers still expect clear accountability.

How to prepare

  • Inventory OT systems: SCADA, relays, remote switching, and comms. Document roles and access review cadence.
  • Document change control, patching and monitoring, and vendor remote access approvals and logging.
  • Summarize OT incidents and near-misses with response timelines and lessons learned.
  • Share a funded roadmap for gaps, with budget, timing, and operational constraints.

Great Answer

OT access is role-based with regular access reviews, vendor access is time-bound and logged, and configuration changes require documented approval. We can show how our network is segmented and how we patch and monitor without disrupting operations. We run incident-response drills and have a funded roadmap for remaining gaps.

Okay

We have basic controls and trusted vendors, but we are still formalizing access reviews and a clear OT roadmap.

Gives Pause

IT handles cybersecurity. Our control systems are not a likely target.

How Rejigg helps: Rejigg limits OT exposure by sharing system maps and policies only with vetted, NDA-signed buyers through controlled access. Learn more in the guide

Bench Strength

How deep is leadership in operations, engineering, and safety, and can you run storms and a capital program without the owner acting as dispatcher and relationship manager?

They are underwriting whether the utility will run safely and consistently after the owner steps back. Key-person risk is highest around storm command, switching discipline, standards engineering, and commission and municipal relationships. Buyers want named backups and a transition plan that has been practiced, not an org chart that looks good on paper.

How to prepare

  • Assign named owners and backups for storm command, dispatch or control room, engineering standards, and safety.
  • Document SOPs for day-to-day operations and major events, including switching orders and escalation paths.
  • Create a 6 to 12-month transition plan with delegation milestones and decision-rights handoffs.
  • Reduce owner dependence in regulator, municipal, and master-contract relationships by introducing the next-in-line leaders.

Great Answer

Operations, engineering, and safety have named leaders, and we have backups for storm command and control room coverage. The owner does not run daily dispatch, and decision rights and escalation paths are documented and used during events. We have a 6 to 12-month plan to hand off the remaining relationships and approvals in stages.

Okay

We have strong people, but the owner still drives storms and key relationships. We are starting to formalize backups and SOPs.

Gives Pause

The team cannot run it without me. I still handle dispatch and the key calls during storms.

How Rejigg helps: Rejigg’s Owner’s Guide walks you through a practical transition plan that reduces key-person risk in the buyer’s model. Learn more in the guide

Ready to Take the Next Step?

Whether you're just exploring or ready to list, we can help.

Get a Free Valuation

See what your electrical utilities business could be worth based on real transaction data.

Try the Calculator

Talk to an Expert

Schedule a free consultation. We'll answer your questions and help you plan your exit.

Schedule a Call

Read the Full Guide

Our 6-step owner's guide covers everything from deciding to sell through post-sale transition.

Start the Guide

Questions Electrical Utilities Owners Ask Us

Value usually comes from forward earnings under your rate order or contract structure, plus the cost and timing of the capital plan. For regulated utilities, buyers often start with rate base, allowed ROE, and rider or tracker recovery, then adjust for reliability trends, open dockets, and catastrophe exposure. For utility-adjacent platforms, buyers lean harder on MSAs, renewal history, and safety performance. Start with Rejigg’s free valuation calculator, then refine with your storm history, hardening backlog, and recovery mechanics.

SAIDI and SAIFI shape the buyer’s view of near-term spend and commission scrutiny. If metrics are worsening outside of major events, buyers often assume a bigger capital and vegetation program and may respond with a lower price, escrow, or contingent value tied to improvements. If reliability is improving, it can support better terms when you can show what changed, what it costs to maintain, and which feeders drove the improvement. Buyers expect major-event context, driver breakdowns, and a credible 24 to 36-month plan.

It depends. A broker can help when you need a wide buyer search or you want a buffer between you and bidders, but many owners can run a focused process themselves. Rejigg provides vetted buyer access, digital NDAs, a secure data room for regulatory, reliability, and capex support, and an offer dashboard, free for sellers. If you want a step-by-step sequence, use the preparation guide and keep disclosure staged to protect sensitive grid information.

Most deals take longer than a typical services sale because diligence and approvals are heavier. Six to twelve months from first outreach to close is common, and it can run longer when commission approval, municipal consent, or contract assignments are involved. The fastest processes usually have buyer-ready packs up front: rate case summary, open docket list, reliability history with major-event notes, asset condition evidence, and a 5 to 10-year capital plan with approval status. A secure data room and NDAs reduce the start-stop delays.

Many jurisdictions require commission approval for a change of control, and you may also need municipal consents, franchise assignments, and approvals under interconnection or transmission agreements. The longest lead item is often the review timeline and any conditions placed on the transaction, such as service-quality commitments, ring-fencing, reporting, or rate protections. Build an “approval map” with each consent, filing requirements, expected timelines, and any relevant precedent orders in your state. Sharing that early helps buyers underwrite closing risk.

Sometimes, but it is more common for utility-adjacent contractors, such as storm restoration, meter services, and vegetation management. Regulated utilities often face approval and asset-structure complexity that can limit SBA fit. SBA lenders still expect clean financials, support for add-backs, a clear view of contract concentration, and a strong safety record. Rejigg’s SBA loan calculator helps model payments and down payment scenarios, and a data room can speed lender diligence.

Working capital is the short-term operating cushion the buyer expects at closing, usually AR, inventory and materials, and prepaid items, less AP and accrued expenses. Utilities can swing seasonally because of storms, fuel and power supply timing, true-ups, and billing cycles, so targets are often set using an average over a defined lookback period. Problems show up when sellers deliver less than the target and take a purchase price adjustment at close. Compare offers based on working-capital terms, not just headline price.

Buyers usually separate routine storm response from major-event spikes, then focus on recovery: riders or trackers, regulatory deferrals, FEMA, insurance, or customer pass-throughs. Recovery timing matters as much as total recovery, since slow reimbursement can pressure liquidity and working capital. A clean package includes a major-event log, the cost tracking method, restoration KPIs, and the exact recovery mechanism with expected timing. Good documentation reduces last-minute pushback during diligence.

Buyers treat vegetation management as a reliability and liability control program, especially in fire-prone areas. They look for a consistent trim cycle, proof of completion by circuit or mileage, clear prioritization of worst-performing feeders, and contractor capacity. They also ask how you handle hazard trees, QA, and audit findings, because defensibility can matter in claims and regulatory reviews. Bring cycle miles, spend history, backlog, and outage correlation, plus the work order and inspection proof.

Regulated utilities are underwritten on rate base growth, allowed returns, and the timing and certainty of cost recovery, so buyers focus on rate orders, open dockets, and service-quality obligations. Utility contractor platforms are underwritten on MSAs, bid and renewal cycles, crew capacity, safety, and storm mobilization terms. Both depend on reliable execution, but the proof is different. For a utility, it is filings and operational metrics, while for a contractor, it is contracts, scorecards, and utilization.

Earnouts are less common for core regulated returns, but they can appear around discrete milestones, such as commission approval timing, a rate case outcome, delivery of a capital program, or hitting reliability targets. They are more common in contractor platforms tied to MSA renewals, margin, or utilization. The main risk is control after closing, since staffing and capex decisions can change whether targets are achievable. If you consider an earnout, define the metric precisely, reporting, dispute resolution, and what happens during major events.

Expect deep requests on operations: outage history with major-event notes, inspection and condition summaries, failure rates, vegetation cycle records, and the 5 to 10-year capital plan with approval status. On the business side, buyers will ask for rate orders, open dockets, audit history, storm recovery mechanisms, and safety incidents with corrective actions. Many also review OT controls for SCADA, relays, and remote access, especially where a system event would be high consequence. A well-organized data room keeps this moving.

Buyers want to see whether power supply is a true pass-through under a fuel or power cost adjustment clause, or whether price risk can hit margin and cash. They review supply sources, contract expirations, counterparty strength, and the next two to three years of exposure, including any renewable, capacity, or congestion obligations. When contracts are short-dated or hedging is limited, buyers often underwrite higher volatility and a larger liquidity buffer. Provide a simple schedule of volumes, terms, expirations, and recovery mechanics.

Structure depends on approvals, tax outcomes, and legacy liabilities, so regulated utility deals often use stock or asset structures that fit commission requirements and ring-fencing expectations. Closing periods can be long, and conditions often include service commitments and reporting. Utility contractor platforms usually look more like middle-market M&A with an LOI, working-capital targets, and reps and warranties, sometimes with seller financing. In both cases, structure follows what must transfer, such as franchises, MSAs, licenses, and prequalification status. Use deal negotiation guidance to catch value leaks in terms.

In utilities, concentration often shows up through load, not churn. A single mine, refinery, or data center can drive peak demand, force feeder and substation upgrades, and create stranded-asset risk if the load drops. Buyers typically ask for top load customers, special contracts, line-extension policies, and who pays for upgrades and system reinforcement. If you can show planning studies, cost responsibility rules, and a disciplined process for extensions, concentration becomes a manageable underwriting item.

Buyers usually want a structured transition because dispatch coverage, switching authority, storm response, and regulator and municipal relationships cannot pause. Three to twelve months of seller support is common, and involvement may extend through the next storm season or a major filing. Spell out decision rights early, including who approves outages, capex scope changes, and vendor changes, plus communication and escalation paths. Getting this into the LOI reduces friction later.

Electrical utilities and contractors hold sensitive system and customer information, including maps, OT details, and critical infrastructure procedures. Use staged disclosure: teaser, then NDA, then limited data room access, then management calls, expanding access only as buyers prove seriousness. Avoid emailing system maps or control documentation to broad lists. Rejigg supports buyer pre-vetting, digital NDAs before access, and a secure data room where you control who sees each folder and when. That protects operations while keeping momentum.

Tax outcomes depend on entity type and deal structure, and utilities add complexity through depreciated plant, deferred taxes, and transaction costs tied to approvals. Asset sales can trigger depreciation recapture and higher ordinary income, while stock sales may be more favorable for sellers but less attractive to buyers seeking basis step-up or liability protection. Bring a tax advisor in early and model multiple structures before signing an LOI. Compare offers using estimated after-tax proceeds, not just purchase price.