Selling a Power Generation business
After hundreds of buyer-seller conversations, power generation deals usually come down to operational truth. Buyers want to see how the plant gets dispatched and paid, what can shut it down, and whether contracts, constraints, and compliance match the model.
What's your power generation business worth?
Sign up to learn more about selling your business. Free valuation included.
What buyers evaluate, and how to prepare
Can you walk me from “MWh produced” to “cash received” without hand-waving?
Deal-criticalFinancial Readiness
What buyers determine
Buyers are checking whether earnings are real, repeatable, and easy to finance. In power generation, that means a clean tie-out from SCADA and revenue-grade meters to ISO or utility settlements, then to bank cash, with true-ups, disputes, and outage-driven volatility clearly explained.
How to prepare
- Reconcile monthly SCADA and meter reads to ISO/utility settlements and bank deposits
- Build an add-backs schedule with invoices and a short write-up for each item
- Create monthly lender-style packs: P&L, balance sheet, cash flow, and KPIs like availability and curtailment
- Upload settlements, meter records, and true-up/dispute history to a buyer-ready data room
Great answer
Yes. Each month, we reconcile SCADA to revenue-grade meter reads, then to ISO/utility settlement statements, then to cash received. We have a monthly bridge that shows MWh, realized price by product (energy, capacity, ancillaries), and every true-up and dispute. Trailing results are normalized for one forced outage month and one settlement true-up, with supporting statements and invoices.
Good answer
We can show settlement statements and bank deposits, and explain the process, but we have not packaged the month-by-month bridge yet.
Red flag
Revenue is whatever the settlement says. Sometimes it’s off, and we don’t really know why.
How Rejigg helps:Rejigg helps you package financials, settlement support, and operating KPIs in one data room so buyers can diligence MWh-to-cash quickly.
Can we step into the PPA—any consent, change-of-control, credit support, or penalties we should worry about?
Deal-criticalOfftake & PPA
What buyers determine
Buyers are underwriting revenue stability and whether the deal can actually close. They look closely at assignment and change-of-control language, credit and LC requirements, and whether availability guarantees or liquidated damages line up with real outage history and planned maintenance.
How to prepare
- Summarize PPA economics: term remaining, pricing, escalators, volume, and performance requirements
- Flag assignment and change-of-control clauses, notice periods, and required consents
- Document payment and dispute history, including any amendments and performance tests
- Model downside months for availability shortfalls, curtailment treatment, and LD (Liquidated Damages) calculations
Great answer
The PPA has 9 years remaining with defined pricing and escalation. Assignment requires notice and written consent, and we have a consent timeline based on prior amendments with the counterparty. We have not had a payment default; we had two reconciliation disputes that cleared within one settlement cycle. We can show how LDs and availability provisions have been calculated historically and how our planned outage schedule stays within contract exclusions.
Good answer
We understand the commercial terms and think assignment is manageable, but we have not pulled the consent path and penalty scenarios into one summary.
Red flag
It’s a standard PPA and should transfer. We have not dug into the change-of-control language.
How Rejigg helps:Rejigg lets you share the PPA, key clauses, and a buyer-facing summary through an NDA-controlled data room.
When does this asset run, who controls dispatch, and what are you really getting paid for—energy, capacity, ancillaries, or a blend?
Deal-criticalDispatch Economics
What buyers determine
Buyers want to understand the earnings engine and how sensitive it is to market shape. They also look for signs that the dispatch profile is chewing up the plant through starts, cycling, and higher forced outage risk, especially if last year’s results look unusually strong.
How to prepare
- Break revenue out by energy, capacity, and ancillaries with monthly prices and volumes
- Explain who controls dispatch and how bids or schedules are set in volatile hours
- Provide run-hours, starts, and constraints like min load, ramp rates, and run-hour caps
- Separate performance gains driven by operations from gains driven by market conditions
Great answer
We can share three years of monthly run-hours, starts, and realized pricing, split across energy, capacity, and ancillaries. Dispatch is ISO-driven, and we handle bidding internally, with documented logic for negative price and congestion periods. Last year’s EBITDA improvement was about 60% higher availability and 40% market pricing, supported by KPIs and settlement detail.
Good answer
We can explain when we run and provide settlements, but we have not packaged the starts and constraint story in a buyer-ready way.
Red flag
We run when prices are good. It depends on the market.
How Rejigg helps:Rejigg’s listing format helps you lead with dispatch, revenue products, and constraints so qualified buyers self-select early.
How often do you trip, what’s the forced outage rate, and what’s the story behind the ugly months?
Deal-criticalReliability History
What buyers determine
Buyers are pricing downtime risk and whether problems are one-off events or recurring patterns. They also look for operational discipline: root-cause analysis, permanent corrective actions, spares coverage, and whether a peak-period trip could wipe out the year’s economics.
How to prepare
- Create an outage history showing forced and planned outages, duration, lost MWh, and revenue impact
- Write short root-cause and corrective-action notes for major events
- Document long-lead spares and vendor lead times for critical equipment
- Share a 12–36-month maintenance and planned outage calendar
Great answer
We have 36 months of forced outage rate and availability by month, plus a one-page summary for each major event. The largest event was a turbine failure; we changed the inspection interval, stocked the long-lead spare, and updated SOPs, and it has not recurred. The next planned major outage is scheduled for Q3 2024 with defined scope, contractor plan, and budget.
Good answer
We track outages and can explain the big events, but we still need to quantify revenue impact and tighten up the corrective-action documentation.
Red flag
Outages happen. We don’t have a clean log beyond maintenance notes.
How Rejigg helps:Rejigg’s data room keeps outage logs, maintenance records, and event narratives together so volatility doesn’t get misread as chronic failure.
What does maintenance really cost, and what have you been deferring?
Deal-criticalMaintenance Reality
What buyers determine
Buyers want to know whether current cash flow is propped up by skipped work. In generation, a low-maintenance year can simply mean a major outage slipped, so buyers underwrite overhaul cycles, corrective maintenance trends, and near-term capex that protects availability and contract performance.
How to prepare
- Split maintenance into routine O&M (Operations and Maintenance), corrective work, and major outages or overhauls by year
- Provide condition evidence like borescopes, inverter failure rates, PR trends, or turbine inspection findings
- List deferred scope with timing, cost, and operating risk if delayed
- Build a 3-year maintenance and capex plan tied to KPIs like availability and heat rate or PR
Great answer
We can show five years of major maintenance history and a three-year forward plan with budgets, outage windows, and vendor commitments. Corrective maintenance has trended down after changes to inspection cadence and spares coverage, and we can back that with work orders and failure mode tracking. Any deferred scope is listed with cost, timing, and why the deferral did not create a reliability risk.
Good answer
We can outline upcoming work and budgets, but we still need a consistent split between routine, corrective, and major outages.
Red flag
Maintenance is normal. We fix things when they break and try to keep spend down.
How Rejigg helps:Rejigg helps you present maintenance history and the forward plan clearly so buyers do not assume a hidden reliability cliff.
What are the interconnection terms and constraints—and who pays for upgrades or studies?
Deal-criticalInterconnection Risk
What buyers determine
Buyers treat interconnection as both value and risk. They underwrite deliverability, injection limits, seasonal constraints, and any upgrade obligations that could cap output or create surprise capex, especially when the model assumes nodal pricing and a specific deliverable MWh profile.
How to prepare
- Provide the interconnection agreement, studies, and a plain-language summary of key limits and rights
- List network upgrade obligations, security postings, milestones, and disputes with status
- Quantify nodal basis and congestion versus hub pricing and explain the drivers
- Describe expansion or co-located storage headroom and what approvals would be required
Great answer
Here is the executed interconnection agreement and study set, plus a summary of firm limits and seasonal constraints. We have nodal basis versus hub history, with examples showing when congestion hits and how often it matters financially. All upgrade obligations are listed with responsible party, estimated cost, and current status, and there is no open “unknown scope.”
Good answer
We have the interconnection documents and can describe constraints, but we need a clearer basis and congestion quantification for buyers.
Red flag
Interconnection has been fine because the plant is operating. We don’t expect upgrades.
How Rejigg helps:Rejigg lets you share interconnection documents and constraint history only with vetted, NDA-signed buyers to avoid misreads and rumor risk.
How often are you curtailed, how deep are the cuts, and is it trending upward on your node?
ImportantCurtailment & Congestion
What buyers determine
Buyers want to know whether modeled MWh is deliverable at your node, not just possible at nameplate. They also look at whether curtailment is seasonal versus structural as more generation interconnects, and whether the rules or offtake contract compensate curtailment in a way that protects margin.
How to prepare
- Report curtailment monthly with MWh, frequency, and cause, like constraints or negative pricing
- Tie curtailment to settlements by showing lost revenue and any compensation
- List mitigation options with expected impact, feasibility, and timeline
Great answer
We track curtailment monthly with MWh and revenue impact, and we break it out by cause, such as transmission constraints versus negative pricing. Over the last 24 months, it has been seasonal and has not trended up, and we can show settlement examples that confirm whether it is compensated under our rules. We have also scoped mitigation options and can share expected economics and required approvals.
Good answer
We can provide curtailment history and drivers, but we have not tied it tightly to nodal pricing and revenue impact.
Red flag
Curtailment happens sometimes. We don’t track it formally.
How Rejigg helps:Rejigg helps you show curtailment and congestion next to dispatch and settlements so buyers underwrite deliverable MWh.
What permits and reporting obligations can shut you down or cap run hours—and have you had any notices of violation?
ImportantCompliance & Permits
What buyers determine
Buyers are looking for clear operating headroom and clean diligence. They want proof that the plant is within permit limits, that monitoring and reporting are consistent, and that any environmental, stormwater, emissions, fire-safety, or land-use obligations are understood and unlikely to trigger downtime or unplanned retrofit spend.
How to prepare
- List permits, key limits, and renewal timelines in one tracker
- Disclose NOVs, deviations, and corrective actions with dates and supporting documents
- Document the monitoring and reporting workflow and name primary and backup owners
- Summarize decommissioning or site restoration obligations and any posted security
Great answer
We operate under the EPA Title V Operating Permit with tracked limits that are reviewed monthly, and we maintain a reporting calendar with named owners and backups. We have had 2 NOVs; for each one, we can show the corrective action, closeout documentation, and the process change that prevented a repeat. Decommissioning and restoration obligations are documented with the landowner and agency requirements, including any posted security.
Good answer
We have the permits and a consultant handles reporting, but we need a cleaner package of limits, renewals, and compliance history.
Red flag
Permits are handled. I’m not sure where the reports or limits are kept.
How Rejigg helps:Rejigg organizes permits, reporting, and NOV history into a diligence package so regulatory questions do not stall the deal.
If you stepped away, who runs the control room, manages outages, and owns ISO/utility relationships?
ImportantOwner Dependence
What buyers determine
Buyers are testing whether the plant will run safely and predictably after the seller exits. They focus on coverage for plant leadership, lead operators, I&C, and whoever owns market systems access, settlements coordination, vendor escalation, and recurring compliance tasks.
How to prepare
- Map operations, maintenance, compliance, and settlements roles to people and backups
- Document SOPs for dispatch coordination, outages, and event response
- Inventory credentials and ISO or utility system access and build a transfer plan
- Set retention and cross-training plans for key roles before going to market
Great answer
Operations are led by the plant manager and lead operator team with full coverage, and the owner is not required for routine dispatch or compliance. ISO and utility communications, market system access, and settlements workflows are held by multiple trained users, with SOPs for outages and event response. We have identified key roles and put retention and cross-training in place for the sale transition.
Good answer
The team is strong, but a couple roles still run through one person, and we are building backups.
Red flag
I’m the one who keeps it running, especially when something trips.
How Rejigg helps:Rejigg helps you share org charts, SOPs, and role coverage alongside a transition plan so buyers can underwrite key-person risk.
What would you change with fresh capital or a larger platform behind you?
Good to haveGrowth Upside
What buyers determine
Buyers want upside that is tied to specific constraints and a realistic execution path. In power generation, that often means fewer forced outages, better dispatch and ancillary revenue capture, interconnection headroom, or a storage or uprate project that can actually clear permitting and interconnection requirements.
How to prepare
- List 3–5 projects with capex, timeline, required consents, and expected KPI impact
- Separate reliability and compliance improvements from market-dependent upsides
- Quantify the constraints each project targets, like curtailment, derates, or cycle limits
Great answer
With incremental capital, we would start with two low-regret items: building spares inventory for long-lead failure points and upgrading controls and telemetry to support ancillary participation. Next, we have a defined path for a battery storage add-on with the approvals needed and a preliminary economics case tied to constraint reduction. For each item, we can show the expected impact on availability, curtailment exposure, and net margin.
Good answer
We have ideas like controls upgrades and more spares, but we have not built a full capex and returns plan with permitting steps.
Red flag
We’d grow more. Power is hot right now.
How Rejigg helps:Rejigg helps you match credible upside to buyers who can execute it and compare offers when different buyers price projects differently.
Straight from buyer evaluations
“They've turned down millions in awarded contracts just because they couldn't get bonded. Solve that one issue and this company doubles its work without adding a single crew lead. That kind of untapped potential is exactly what I look for.”
Room to GrowBuyer seeing growth opportunity at a solar contractor limited by bonding
“The fleet is maintained on schedule, utilization is well above average, and the operators have been with the company for decades. When your crew has that kind of tenure, customers call you first for every job.”
Experienced CrewBuyer impressed by long-tenured operators and well-maintained equipment
“The service side has great margins, plus the construction work keeps crews busy year-round. Having both high-margin service contracts and a full project pipeline under one roof is hard to find.”
Balanced RevenueBuyer seeing the value of combined construction and service revenue
“The owner has already stepped back and his operations team runs every job from start to finish. I'm not buying a job here. I'm buying a company with real leadership and a proven safety record.”
Strong LeadershipBuyer seeing strong management independence at a power services company
“They've been through two industry downturns and kept their customer base both times. Having customers across different sectors gives me confidence this business can weather any cycle.”
Proven ResilienceBuyer impressed by how the company performed through tough times
How buyers value this type of business
Where you land in that range depends on how much of your work is under contract, the condition of your equipment, and whether your team runs jobs without you in the field.
3x–7x
annual profit
Depending on contracts, equipment, and how much runs without you
What drives a premium
- Signed contracts and a strong pipelineHaving projects already under contract gives buyers revenue they can count on from day one.
- Equipment in good shape with recordsWell-maintained equipment with documented inspection records shows buyers they won't face surprise costs after closing.
- Bonding relationships and prequalificationsActive bonding capacity and being pre-approved with utilities or general contractors lets a buyer step into bigger projects right away.
- Operators and technicians who've been aroundLicensed electricians, certified operators, and experienced project leads who plan to stay make the business truly transferable.
Common add-backs
Personal vehicles and fuel that run through the fleet accountRent above market rate on a yard or shop you ownOne-time equipment purchases that were expensed instead of spread over timeFamily members on payroll who won't continue after the sale
What the process looks like
5–8 months from listing to closemedian 201 days across closed deals
- 1ListingThe day your business goes live on Rejigg.
- 2First messageMedian: 4 days laterA buyer requests a conversation by sending a first pitch.
- 3First callMedian: 7 days laterYour first completed call with a buyer to answer questions about your business.
- 4Letter of intentMedian: 59 days laterA buyer submits an LOI and you choose to accept, decline, or negotiate.
- 5Deal closeMedian: 89 days laterAssuming all is well in due diligence, you close the deal.
Typical buyer types
Energy services companies looking to add solar, generation, or crane capacityCompanies building a network of power and utility services businessesFirst-time buyers with operations or engineering backgrounds drawn to contract-based workLarger contractors looking to acquire smaller companies for their bonding capacity or crews
Common questions about selling a Power Generation business
Ready to see what your business is worth?
Share a few details and get an honest valuation. No pressure, no commitment.