Selling a Video Production Business

Based on patterns across hundreds of real buyer-seller diligence calls, we’ve helped deals happen on Rejigg. These are the video-specific topics that move price fast: rights and releases, fee versus pass-through spend, whether you can staff shoots without panic, and whether the work stays consistent after the founder steps back.

Get a Free ValuationSchedule a CallRead the Guide

What buyers ask and how to be ready

Each topic below comes from real buyer-seller conversations. Here's what they ask, what they're really evaluating, and how to prepare.

Rights & IP

Do you actually own what you’re selling the client?

Buyers are checking whether you can legally deliver what you promise, and whether they’re inheriting liability around footage ownership, project files, releases, and music or stock licensing. They also want to know if any “library value” is real. That only counts if you can prove a clean chain of rights on the specific assets that generate revenue. If this is messy, deals slow down, and the price usually moves because nobody wants a rights problem after close.

How to prepare

  • Write your default stance on finals, raw footage, and project files in plain English
  • Collect contractor work-for-hire and rights assignment agreements in one folder
  • Keep releases and music/stock license proof in each project folder, tied to the delivered edit
  • List owned IP or licensing revenue separately and document the rights chain

Great Answer

Our contract spells out who owns the final deliverables, whether raw footage is included, and how we handle project files. For every job, we keep a folder with model and location releases, plus music and stock license receipts, and we can pull examples from recent projects on the spot. Every contractor signs a work-for-hire and rights assignment, so the company clearly owns the edit, motion assets, and project files we deliver.

Okay

We have standard rights language, and we usually keep releases and licenses. Some older projects are harder to pull quickly because the documentation is scattered.

Gives Pause

We’ve never had an issue, so we don’t really track releases or licenses. Rights depend on what the client asked for at the time.

How Rejigg helps: Rejigg’s built-in data room lets you share contracts, releases, and license proof in stages, so buyers can validate rights without email attachments. Learn more in the guide

Pass-Throughs

What portion of your revenue is pass-through, and what’s your actual fee?

Production companies can look larger on paper when crew, rentals, travel, locations, talent, and licensing run through the books. Buyers want to see what you actually earn for creative, production, and post versus what you collect and pay out on the client’s behalf. If you cannot separate fee from pass-through by project type, your margins feel squishy, and the buyer will discount them.

How to prepare

  • Split revenue into fee versus pass-through by project type using the last 12 months of jobs
  • Show typical budget splits for your core offerings and whether you mark up outside costs
  • Document where overruns happen and how you handle them with approvals and change orders
  • Clean up bookkeeping categories so pass-through is classified consistently

Great Answer

On our brand film projects, our fee usually lands around 35–45% of the total budget. The rest is crew, gear, travel, locations, talent, and licensing that we pay through. We report pass-through separately and can show examples by project type with invoices behind them. When outside costs change, we use a pre-approved contingency and a written change order before we spend more.

Okay

We can explain pass-through versus fee on most projects, but we have not summarized it cleanly by project type yet.

Gives Pause

Revenue is revenue. We don’t separate pass-through, but gross margin is around X% overall.

How Rejigg helps: Rejigg’s data room lets you share job lists with fee and pass-through splits, plus supporting invoices, without spreadsheet ping-pong. Learn more in the guide

Job Profitability

Which project types make money—and which ones are basically marketing?

Buyers want to see that you understand your economics by offering, not just in the year-end numbers. In video, the margin profile can swing a lot between event capture, animation-heavy work, post-only retainers, always-on social cutdowns, and brand films. If a big slice of revenue is “relationship work” that soaks producer and edit time, the buyer will price that reality in.

How to prepare

  • Group the last 12–24 months of projects into the 5–8 offerings you actually sell
  • Estimate gross margin by offering using real job costs
  • Document changes you’ve made to protect margin, like revision limits and better estimating
  • Flag any offerings you keep for relationship reasons and explain why

Great Answer

Our best margins are on ongoing post packages and always-on social cutdowns because the workflow is repeatable and the scope stays tight. Our worst margins used to be small “simple” shoots that turned into stakeholder management and endless versioning, so we now price producer time and versioning explicitly, or we pass on those jobs. We can show a service-line view with job examples, including what we missed and what we changed.

Okay

We know which work feels profitable and which work is painful, but we have not turned that into a clean job-costed view yet.

Gives Pause

We do everything, and it averages out. We don’t track profitability by project type.

How Rejigg helps: Rejigg gives you one place to organize the backup behind service-line margins, so buyers can verify the story quickly. Learn more in the guide

Scope Control

When a client says ‘one more round,’ who pays for it?

Revision creep is a quiet margin killer, especially in post where time is the product. Buyers want to see a scope process that protects profit without turning every client request into a showdown. They also want evidence your team can manage messy feedback, like multiple stakeholders and late approvals, in a consistent way.

How to prepare

  • Write a revision policy you actually enforce
  • Standardize deliverable lists and define what triggers a change order
  • Show how feedback is collected and who on the client side is allowed to approve changes
  • Update estimating templates to include commonly missed items like post producer time and versioning

Great Answer

Our scope lists deliverables and includes two revision rounds with clear definitions. Feedback comes through one client owner, and our producer consolidates internal notes so editors are not chasing five email threads. Anything beyond scope becomes a priced change order, and we can show recent examples where we billed for extra versions without it turning into a fight.

Okay

We define revisions in the scope most of the time, but enforcement is still inconsistent across clients.

Gives Pause

We try to keep clients happy. Revisions are basically unlimited, and we sort it out later.

How Rejigg helps: Rejigg’s data room makes it easy to share your SOW templates and real change-order examples so buyers can see scope discipline, not just hear about it. Learn more in the guide

Cash Timing

Do you fund shoots with your own cash before you get paid?

Buyers want to know whether growth creates cash stress because you are fronting crew, rentals, travel, and talent weeks before payment. In production, a job can be profitable and still squeeze the business if deposits and milestones are loose. Lenders care too, because cash timing affects whether a loan-backed buyer can operate without constantly juggling payables.

How to prepare

  • Document billing terms by project size, including deposit percentage and milestone timing
  • Pull accounts receivable aging and call out repeat slow-pay accounts and your process
  • Explain how third-party costs are handled, like client prepay or deposit covering hard costs
  • Build a simple cash timeline example for a mid-size and a large project

Great Answer

We don’t routinely float big third-party costs. On a typical $25k project, we take a deposit up front, then invoice milestones tied to pre-pro, shoot, and delivery. On larger jobs, the deposit covers crew and rentals, and we do not book travel or talent until the deposit clears. We can show real cash timelines from recent projects, including when invoices were sent and when cash landed.

Okay

We usually take a deposit, but the percentage varies by client, and we still front costs occasionally on rush jobs.

Gives Pause

Clients pay when they pay. We cover crew and rentals and hope it settles out.

How Rejigg helps: Rejigg lets you present billing terms, AR aging, and project cash examples next to your financials, which cuts down lender and buyer follow-ups. Learn more in the guide

Owner Dependence

Can the business deliver the same quality without the founder?

In video production, founder dependence usually shows up in taste and control points: who writes the treatment, who picks the DP (Director of Photography), who calms the client on set, and who makes the final cut call. Buyers want proof the quality bar and the process live in the company, with named people and repeatable steps. If it all routes through the founder, buyers will push for a longer transition or change the deal structure.

How to prepare

  • Map delivery roles for your core offering and name primary and backup owners for each role
  • Pick 3 recent projects and document who made the creative and operational decisions
  • Write what you will do post-close and what you will stop doing, with a realistic timeline
  • Identify the first leadership hire you would make and estimate total cost

Great Answer

We can show recent projects where our producer ran pre-pro and client comms, a creative lead owned the look, and post was supervised without me in the day-to-day. We keep a delivery map by role with primary and backup coverage for producer, DP, editor, motion, and finishing. I’m open to a defined transition period focused on introductions and high-level review, not being the bottleneck on every cut.

Okay

I’m still in most key decisions, but we have a strong producer and editor who can take more ownership with a structured handoff.

Gives Pause

Clients hire us for my taste. I direct most projects and approve every cut, so it’s hard to replicate without me.

How Rejigg helps: Rejigg’s deal workspace keeps transition expectations, buyer questions, and your handoff plan organized, so owner-dependence gets addressed early. Learn more in the guide

Crew Bench

Is your crew bench real, or a spreadsheet that changes every week?

Buyers want to know if your freelancer bench is repeatable by role and geography, and whether quality holds when your usual people are booked. Scaling through a roster is normal in production, as long as briefing, look references, and post workflows are consistent. If the bench only works because the founder personally texts the right people, it can feel fragile after a sale.

How to prepare

  • List your top freelancers per key role and show how often you used them in the last 12 months
  • Document how you brief crews and where quality is checked from pre-pro through finishing
  • Call out any single points of failure and show a realistic backup plan
  • Summarize rate trends and where you’ve seen cost increases

Great Answer

For each key role, we have repeat collaborators, and we can show staffing frequency from last year by project type. Crews get consistent briefs with look references, shot lists, and call sheet expectations, and then we run defined review checkpoints in post. We do have a few top-tier people for premium work, and we have backups who already know our workflow and client expectations.

Okay

We have go-to people for most roles, but we haven’t documented usage frequency and backups by market yet.

Gives Pause

We hire whoever is available. It usually works out, and clients don’t notice much difference.

How Rejigg helps: Rejigg’s data room lets you share a bench map and staffing process without emailing personal contact lists to buyers. Learn more in the guide

Client Repeatability

Are you a production partner, or a vendor that gets re-bid every quarter?

Buyers are trying to understand how predictable your next 12 months are. Video clients rarely “renew,” but many do come back for repeatable moments like quarterly campaigns, annual events, product launches, and ongoing social content. They also look for relationship depth, including whether producers and account coverage own the day-to-day or everything runs through the founder.

How to prepare

  • Build a repeat-history view for top clients, with plain-English triggers and cadence
  • Map relationship coverage: who briefs, who gives notes, who approves, and who pays
  • Split direct-to-brand revenue from agency or white-label work and explain the risk of each
  • Create a simple pipeline view: awarded, active bids, verbal yes, and early-stage

Great Answer

Our top accounts come back on patterns we can explain. One books quarterly campaigns, another does product launches plus a monthly cutdown package. For major accounts, at least two client contacts work directly with our producer or PM, so the relationship is not single-threaded through me. We can share a pipeline view with expected shoot windows, active bids, and what’s already awarded.

Okay

We have strong repeat clients and good relationships, but we haven’t mapped coverage and repeat cadence in a formal view yet.

Gives Pause

We get referrals, and people come back when they need video. It’s relationship-based, and it works.

How Rejigg helps: Rejigg’s buyer vetting and digital NDAs let you share concentration and repeat patterns safely before you reveal client names. Learn more in the guide

Systems & Files

Can the buyer step into your tools, files, and footage without chaos?

Buyers are looking for operational continuity and hidden obligations, like storing client footage forever or media scattered across personal drives. A clean handoff means someone new can find the project files, releases, exports, and archives fast. It also signals you can keep delivering when editors change or when you add a second team.

How to prepare

  • Standardize project folder structure and permissions for raw, proxies, project files, exports, and releases
  • Document what clients receive versus what you keep and for how long
  • Write an archive and retention policy and clarify who pays for storage
  • List core tools for project management and review and name who controls access

Great Answer

Every project follows the same folder structure with clear owners for raw, proxies, project files, exports, and paperwork. We have a documented retention policy, and client terms match it, so we are not quietly promising unlimited archiving. Access is controlled by the company, not tied to an editor’s personal drive or personal accounts.

Okay

We have a mostly consistent way we store projects, but it is not fully standardized, and older work is split across platforms.

Gives Pause

Files are wherever the editor put them. We can usually find things, but it takes digging.

How Rejigg helps: Rejigg’s secure data room helps you package process docs, example projects, and policies so buyers can diligence operations without access to your internal drives. Learn more in the guide

Ready to Take the Next Step?

Whether you're just exploring or ready to list, we can help.

Get a Free Valuation

See what your video production business could be worth based on real transaction data.

Try the Calculator

Talk to an Expert

Schedule a free consultation. We'll answer your questions and help you plan your exit.

Schedule a Call

Read the Full Guide

Our 6-step owner's guide covers everything from deciding to sell through post-sale transition.

Start the Guide

Questions Video Production Owners Ask Us

Most video production companies are priced off seller earnings, then adjusted for how transferable the work is. Valuations tend to be higher when you can separate your true fee from pass-through spend, control revision creep, explain why clients come back, and show the business can run without the founder directing every job. You can sanity-check your range with Rejigg’s free valuation calculator.

No. Brokers usually charge 5–10% of the sale price for packaging, outreach, and process management you can run yourself with the right tools. Rejigg gives you pre-vetted buyers, digital NDAs, direct messaging, a secure data room, and deal tracking, so you can sell broker-free and keep control of the narrative. Start with the prepare to sell guide.

Often yes, as long as the company looks like a stable cash-flowing service business and the books hold up to lender review. In video production, lenders usually dig into customer concentration, founder dependence, and whether reported revenue is inflated by pass-through costs like crew and rentals. You can model payments and down payment scenarios with the SBA loan calculator before you negotiate deal terms.

Add-backs are owner expenses you believe will not continue after a buyer takes over, like personal travel, one-time legal fees, or above-market owner pay. In video production, buyers will question anything that looks like normal job delivery, including crew, gear, travel, or subcontractors that were required to complete projects. Keep add-backs conservative and attach proof next to each line item. Rejigg’s data room makes it easy to share support without long email threads.

Most buyers expect a monthly profit and loss statement, a balance sheet, and enough detail to understand job economics. For video production, that usually includes a project list that separates fee revenue from pass-through costs, plus payroll and contractor spend, so a buyer can see how work is staffed. If you use QuickBooks, Rejigg’s QuickBooks integration can import and organize this faster inside a secure data room.

Buyers usually underwrite a content library as a separate asset with its own risks and documentation. Expect requests for proof you own the rights, a clear revenue history by platform, and an explanation of what is recurring versus one-off. Many “libraries” look valuable until diligence finds missing releases or music licenses that cannot be used for new distribution. Clean rights and clear reporting can add value. Messy rights can drag down the whole deal.

Most sales take months, not weeks. Buyers need time to understand project-based revenue, review contracts, and confirm rights, releases, and licensing practices. Owners move faster when they already have a fee versus pass-through breakdown, a clear repeat-client story, and organized paperwork for recent jobs. Rejigg keeps messaging, NDAs, documents, and offers in one place, so you are not re-answering the same diligence questions. See the due diligence checklist.

Transitions usually center on client confidence and creative continuity. A common approach is a defined period where the seller handles introductions, joins a few key client meetings, and provides high-level creative review while producers and leads run delivery. Buyers often push back on open-ended “call me anytime” arrangements because the company stays tied to the founder. Build a client-by-client handoff plan. The transitioning guide shows a practical structure.

An earnout means part of the purchase price is paid later if the business hits agreed results after closing. In video production, earnouts are common when revenue depends on a few relationships, when the founder is central to selling, or when margins depend on how scope is managed. Push for a metric that matches reality and is hard to game, like collected gross profit from retained accounts. Rejigg’s deal tracking helps you compare earnout-heavy offers side-by-side with cleaner cash offers.

A working capital adjustment is a closing-day true-up for the money tied up in running the business, like unpaid invoices, bills you owe, and prepaid expenses. Video production can get tricky because of client deposits, unbilled work in progress, and third-party costs that land between the shoot date and payment. Buyers want to avoid paying twice for the same value. Before you sign, get clear on what is billed, what is collected, and what costs are already committed.

Usually yes, but buyers mainly care whether the gear helps win work or if it is just sitting on the balance sheet. Expect requests for an inventory list with age, condition, and whether items are owned, leased, or financed. Some strong production companies stay light on gear and rent per job, which can be fine if your pricing supports it and your vendor relationships are solid. Put inventory and depreciation detail in your Rejigg data room so diligence is straightforward.

Agency and white-label revenue can be strong, but buyers underwrite who controls the relationship. If an agency producer can swap vendors next week, the revenue feels less durable than direct-to-brand work. Buyers will ask how often you repeat with the same agency, whether you are in a preferred vendor pool, and what happens when agency staff turns over. Show repeat patterns by agency, not just end-client names.

Buyers focus on documents that control deliverability and liability. That includes client contracts covering ownership and usage, contractor agreements that assign rights to the company, and releases and licensing paperwork tied to specific projects. They also review long-term commitments like studio leases, equipment financing, and software subscriptions. Variation by client or producer is common in production. What matters is having a clear current standard and being able to explain exceptions quickly.

Most buyers will ask for limits on competing and on soliciting clients and key crew for a period of time. In video production, the freelancer and lead bench often matters almost as much as the client list, so non-solicit language can include core contractors as well as employees. The terms should match real life, including the services you do, the geography you serve, and a reasonable timeframe. Put draft language on the table early to avoid late-stage surprises.

Treat client names as sensitive until you know the buyer is real and serious. Many sellers share anonymized concentration and repeat patterns first, then share names later after a signed NDA and a solid first call. Rejigg supports this flow. Buyers are pre-vetted, NDAs are signed digitally, and you control who sees what inside the data room, so you can run a direct process without exposing your book too early.

Look at how certain the money is and how realistic the transition expectations are. Compare cash at close, any seller financing, earnouts tied to retaining accounts, and what the buyer expects from you in the first 3–12 months. For video production, ask how they plan to keep producers, editors, and key freelancers engaged, because delivery talent is part of what clients are buying. Rejigg’s offer comparison dashboard shows terms side-by-side. See negotiate a deal.

Most deal issues come from surprise risk, not the reel. Buyers get nervous when rights and releases are unclear, when margins shrink once pass-through is separated, when revision culture creates unpaid labor, or when the crew bench depends on the founder’s personal relationships. Many of these are fixable with better documentation and consistent processes. Rejigg helps you pressure-test questions early with vetted buyers under NDA, before you are deep into a single deal.